there In a hurry hut that no one stopped or hindered her from reading; that she can read and write and could have read the paper had she wanted to. She says the reason she Nike Air Max 90 did not read the paper was because her time was limited and because she had absolute confidence in Hamilton; that she left the whole matter to him because she thought he was a nice square honest gentleman. When she acknowledged the paper she asked if they wanted anything further of her and they said no and that they would finish up the paper after she left.The evidence shows affirmatively then that the doctrine of notice by knowledge of an agent has no application here because up to this point not taking into consideration said Item hereafter to be noted the agent had no knowledge and therefore could affect the principal with none.Said exception involves the claim that Price actively aided Hamilton in perpetrating the fraud upon plaintiff both at the time of the acknowledgment and up to and including Nike Australia the time when the defendant bank made Hamilton a loan oftaking the note and mortgage as collateral security. It Is alleged Price and Hamilton confederated with the purpose and intent of defrauding plaintiff out of the sum of G the face of the note and mortgage and that to accomplish this they induced her to execute the mortgage and incumber her property and that it was understood and agreed between these two before the mortgage was acknowledged that the paper was to be taken up by Price or the bank for a sum less than the face of the mortgage. It has already been seen that plaintiff attempts to make out a case of concealment against Price with an intimation if it be not stronger that he took advantage of her hurry and that between his conduct her hurry and her faith in Hamilton she was kept from reading what she otherwise would have read and which she was able to read if she desired to. To give color to Christian Louboutin Outlet this there Is a claim In pleading that up to this time plaintiff had little or no experience with legal papers or mortgages or documents; that she did not have sufficient familiarity with mortgages and notes to discriminate between an application for a loan or for a mortgage and a mortgage itself; that Hamilton had made her believe she was to sign an applicationfor a loan for which the money was to come through defendant bank and she believed when she signed the mortgage that she was In fact signing an application for Nike Air Max a loan and that she expected and believed as Hamilton said in the presence of Price that when the mortgage was made it would be to the one who maue the loan and not to Hamilton; and that the money for It would come through the bann and be paid to her. To her testimony that anything of the sort was said In the hearing of Price Price makes full denial and other and fuller accounts given by plaintiff as to what occurred at the time the acknowledgment was taken and when it is claimed this assertion was made before Price show that Coach Outlet Store Online the assertion itself Is an afterthought and shoring up.As to the claim of unfamlllarlty with notes and mortgages and Coach Outlet Store Online with business generally It suffices to say that she shows varied business experience covering years including the conducting of a business of her own which she afterwards transferred by going into the employ of a large dry Christian Louboutin Outlet goods company; that in that position Nike Shoes Australia she now buys and for years has bought the goods necessary for the dressmaking department of her employer; that she Is manager for the dressmaking department and Coach Outlet Store Online Is the head of it; and that it Is a large department doing a large business. It appears she has been a widow someyears. She says the property Incumbered was left her by the husband by will; that she has considerably Improved it and paid off an