that under such circumstances a demonstrative legacy Is specific Nike Air Max 90 or a specifically bequeathed legacy and not subject to abatement in the class with general legacies. Sectionstoare declaratory of the commonlaw rule as to legacies. Section Is declaratory of the commonlaw rule that on abatement different classes of legacies do not prorate between each other but each class in its order must be exhausted before abatement can take place at all in the next higher class. The primary amount of the residuary legacies to the four sisters of being less than the amount of the total debts and expense will be entirely exhausted and still leave a balance of the Indebtedness of . Resort must next be had to the the general legacy Oakley Sunglasses to the wife still leaving an unpaid balance of debts ofto be paid by the demonstrative legacies ratably.It appears from the record that one of the nieces and the nephew to whom bequests were made were minors until recently and that the trial court required the executors to pay their legacies in full with Interest. We are aware of no rule of law under the view we have taken of this case that would Nike Shoes Australia exempt the legacies of these minors from abatement for the payment of debts. In that respect their legacies are subject to the same rule as legacies of an adult. It also appears that the joint demonstrative legacy of to Mrs. Jewett and daughter has been overpaid by more than in some wrongful manner not authorized by law and the amount of this overpayment should be treated as still being in the hands of the executors to be accounted for by them. It appears that the executors have had possession of the cash funds of this estate for something over seven years. The executors should be charged with the full amount ofreceived by them together with all Interest and profit if any they may have received therefrom. North Face Outlet Store They should also be charged with interest on all sums of money heretofore paid out or advanced on account of Nike Australia legacies under said will and the total net sum still remaining of all said receipts after North Face Outlet the payment of all debts and expenses should be divided pro rata among all the said demonstrative legatees.The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded to the circuit court with directions to enter judgment in harmony with this decision but without costs to any party. This decision applies to each and all of the three appeals taken in this case.POLLEY P. J took no part in this decision.CALDWELL et al. v. PIERSON et al. NoSupreme .One purchasing land from the vendee of the purchaser of tax title is not an innocent purchaser where the successors of the original holders were in possession and The North Face Outlet farmed the land at all times although their contract assignments were never recorded; such possession being notice equivalent to recordation.Ed. Note.For other cases see Vendor and Purchaser Cent. Dig.; Dec. Dig. t .For other definitions see Words and Phrases First and Second Series Innocent Purchaser; Notice.Evidence heldinsufficient Nike Air Max to show service on the owner and the party in possession of notice to redeem from tax sale as required by Pol. Code i amended by Laws c so that the subsequent tax deed was void.Ed. Note.For other cases see Taxation Cent. While Pol. Code provides that The North Face Outlet Store a tax deed shall be prima facie evidence of the truth of all the facts therein recited still this prima facie case prevails o