Links News Contact Us About us Privacy Terms FAQ Add feedback Invite a friend Bookmark
Home Members Blogs Photos Videos Music Groups Classifieds Events Polls Forums Articles Boards chat
Articles
grandson touching his
10-25-11




purpose and wish in the disposition of his estate after his death in so far as it affected the grandson. This was purely a personal transaction or communication and came within the inhibition of the statute. This Incompetent witness was called upon to and allowed to state over objection the contents of this communication. This was clearly within the Nike Free Inhibition of the statute and cannot be considered by us in this case triable de novo here.But three witnesses were called who testified to the contents of this Instrument although It appears there were others who were equally cognizant of Its contents if such instrument existed. These other witnesses were the mother and fatherinlaw of Mark. George Ray the' fatherinlaw testified that he wasyears old; that Mark married his daughter; that Nike Max Air 90 they meaning Mark and his daughter were at his house the winter of ; that while there he saw a paper in their possession purporting to be signed by A W. Harlan; that he read the paper; that it was shown to him by his daughter; that he thought the paper stated like this: That he had Nike Shop changed his mind in regard to the land that he had deeded to Mark and he Intended that as a gift and intended later for Mark to get his equal share of his property. He further testified that Ralph Lauren Outlet he had no knowledge about the paper except that his daughter handed a paper to him and he read It; that old man Harlan's name was signed to it;that he had six children at home the oldestyears of age; that be was not the only one the daughter showed the paper to; that she passed it around and they looked at it; that he thinks his wife and oldest daughter read it; that she took it out Nike Free Run of her pocket and handed it to him and he gave It back to her. He further testified that he did not know Mr. Harlan's handwriting and does Polo Outlet Online not know whether this paper shown to him was in Harlan's handwriting or not He further testified that his attention was not called to the existence of this paper since the fall of until the fall ofor .The other witness Mrs. Saltzgaber testified that the deceased came to her house on election daythat she remembered his making out a paper; that she saw the paper read it; saw him write it; that she knew his handwriting; knew his signature; The North Face Outlet that this paper that she refers to was in his handwriting and has his signature. Polo Ralph Lauren Outlet She further testified that at the time the deceased said to her that Mark should have more; that the land that he had given him was not enough; that he should have an equal share with the other children; that he told her this frequently before this time; that after the paper was written she read The North Face Outlet Store it; that the old man handed it to Mark and Mark handed it to the wife; that she and the wife rend it over to see what disposition he was going to make of the land: that the paper stated Ralph Lauren Outlet Online that he had charged Mark with the land that he had given him and he wanted Mark to have all; he was going to give that to him as a gift; and that he would share equally with the others in Nike Max Air the distribution of the land when he was dead. She further testified that she knew nothing of the paper since that time; that her attention was not called to the fact again until .This is practically all the testimony competent and incompetent offered by the intervener to support his contention that after the making of the deeds Mark received an instrument North Face Outlet Store modifying the terras of the deeds in so far as the deeds released the estate from any claim on the part of Mark to share in the balance left at the time of the death of A. W. Harlan. According to the testimony of these witnesses this paper evidenced the fulfillment of a promise frequently made prior to its execution. It was a Nike Argentina paper that Mark evidently recognized the need of if he would participate in his grandfather's estate after his death a paper he desired and prized and if his contention be true secured for the purpose of enabling him to hold not only the property deeded to him in the deeds North Face Outlet hereinbefore

Copyright © 2012 Your Company.