she says she gave Hamilton an abstract in the fall of and that it had been brought up to date a few years before. In speaking of a Christian Louboutin Outlet transaction in Texas land in which Coach Outlet Store Online Hamilton helped her she says:I gave him Nike Air Max 90 power of attorney to look after the business for me paid him a fee to do itIn connection with her claim she did not know she was signing a mortgage she says she did not know it was a mortgage because If she had she would have read It carefully because she had paid off one mortgage and found it was hard work. It seems her mother had gone to California and that at this time Hamilton broached the subject of selling the property. At Nike Air Max this time she entertained the thought that she might sell here take her son to Berkeley to have him graduate and make a home for her mother. She says Hamilton had one or two applicants but It did not look good to her because It was for an exchange which she did not know very much about and she told him so. Thereupon he said he was getting good loans from a Kansas City house and thought he could get her one and that after it was loaned she could rent the house. He suggested that after such loan was made she could rent the property and use the income to redeem and that by this method she could get as much money as she could by selling. She says this did not seem good to her did not look straight and she told Hamilton so. She did not agree with Hamilton at first but did later agreeing he should try to make a loan ofAfter talking it over with her son she decided that if the worst came to the worst and the loaner took the place she would not feel as though she had cheated them or they had cheated her; that by this time it looked very nice and straight. She thought no one would be hurt because the property was worth more than The original petition speaks often of execution of a mortgage. In an amendment it is explained that this is due to mistake and Christian Louboutin Outlet was put in because after information that she had in fact given a mortgage she did not deem it material that she had been misled into the. making of such an instrument; that in fact she did not understand or comprehend when she executed the paper that it was a mortgage and believed it to he an application for a loan and something not made payable to Hamilton. It is averred In this amendment that she believed the loan would come through the bank of which Price was president; that Hamilton misled her into the Coach Outlet Store Online execution of the paper by making her believe it was in fact an application for a loan and not a mortgage; Nike Australia that Price knew at the time that it was a mortgage and knew or had reason to believe that plaintiff understood and believed it was not a mortgage but an application for a loan. There Coach Outlet Store Online is no evidence of this as to Price and it is fully denied. It will be noticed she finally came to the point where she agreed that Hamilton should try to get her a loan ofIn testifying to her understanding of what was signed by her she says in spite of this that she did not know she was signing a paper which Hamilton was to use in making the loan; that she is positive as to this and cannot be mistaken about It. Then she says she did know she was signing a paper in connection with this loan that Hamilton was to make for her. In her original petition she avers that the paper signed was made to himto enable the said W. S. Hamilton to procure the loan for this plaintiff. No amendment seeks to withdraw Nike Shoes Australia or explain this allegation. The