| Home | Members | Blogs | Photos | Videos | Music | Groups | Classifieds | Events | Polls | Forums | Articles | Boards | chat |
Articles
Articles
W. H. Seeger, Pres. It does not purport to be signed by the bank. But, assuming it was issued on the bank's letter paper, and that its phraseology Is designedly couched so as to convey the Impression it was the act of the bank through W. H. Seeger, Presthen there is a fatal omission In the petition. It does not allege that Seeger, as second vice president, had proper authority, in North Face Coupon the name of the bank, to make the assurance contained in the' letter. His authority In that behalf under that statute Is an Issue of fact and must be tendered. In knightkawlings,mos. WL R. A. N. S Division , and in mckeerudd,mos. Wam. St. Rep Division , of this court construed that statute. They discuss the necessity for a written, as contradistinguished from an oral, representation as a basis for liability for false representations on the financial ability of third persons. Those cases do not hold in judgment the question of the authority of Moncler Outlet the person who signed the letter In a representative capacity to bind his principal, but they deal with the statute and make clear the necessity of obeying It, in order to recover. If this petition had alleged that the bank Issued the letter and had stopped with that, without showing how it was issued and by whom signed, this phase of the matter might not arise on demurrer, but become an issue of fact to be raised by an answer. But this petition counts on the whole lettersignature and all. From that It appears that Seeger, Pres issued quiring a court to take judicial notice that the duties of a second vice president of a bank are of a sort permitting him to bind the bank and cast liability on it by false statements made in letters of recommendation. If he had such authority, It was matter of allegation and proof.e Finally it urged that a national bank cannot be financially bound or obligated by papers of the character sued on; The North Face Sale that the matter is ultra vires. On this Oakley Sunglasses point reliance is put on Commercial National bankpirie,fedc. A A In that case it was held that the guaranty of a national bank, whereby It obligated itself to Nike Shoes Australia pay for any bill of goods one Webb might buy of certain dealers in Chicago, was ultra vires. But on our record the proposition opens an unprofitable field of exploration, for the case breaks before the point is reached. When we have a case hinging only on the point that a bank cannot be mulcted in damages, and Its welfare as a going concern put to hazzard because of a false representation made concerning a matter wholly disconnected from North Face Coupons its own affairs, and wholly concerning a third party, we can deal with it The point is reserved. In view of all the premises, the demurrer was well ruled.Therefore the judgment should be affirmed. It is so- ordered. All concur, except VALLIANT, jabsentunder the Constitution, providing that no bill shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in the title, the title of Acts , p Oakley Canada entitled An act relating to manufacturing, mechanical, mercantile and other establishments and places, and the employment, safety, health and work hours of employes, is not sufficiently broad to cover provisions regulating the construction of platforms, passageways, and other structures in and around railroad yards and depots; for under the doctrine of North Face Sale ejusdem generis the words other establishments and places refer to establishments and places similar to those specifically enumerated, and not to railroads and railroad employe's, treated as separate subjects for legislation.authorizing the Commissioner of Labor, or assistant inspector, to notify employers to make alterations or additions within a specified time, and section , providing that railroad platforms shall be so located and erected as to insure as far as possible the safety of employes, must be construed together; and a railway company is not guilty of violating the statute until it lias been notified to make alterations in its platforms.Ed. Note.For Nike Australia other cases, see Master and Servant, Dec. Dig..Appeal from Cheap North Face Circuit Court, Jackson County; Jno. G. Park, Judge.Action by
